Skip to content

US Property Tax Rates by State (2026)

Property tax rates by state across the United States shown on a color coded map with average effective property tax rate data and state level comparisons.
Property Tax Rates by State: All 50 States + DC Ranked (2026)

Effective property tax rates for all 50 states and Washington, DC, ranked from highest to lowest, with regional patterns, no-income-tax state comparisons, and the 2026 federal SALT deduction cap explained.

New Jersey and Illinois have the highest effective property tax rates in the country at 1.88% each, while Hawaii has the lowest at 0.29%, according to the Tax Foundation’s 2026 property tax table, based on 2024 Census American Community Survey data. On a $300,000 home, that gap is the difference between roughly $5,640 a year and $870 a year.

Effective rates have held in a similar band for the past several years, with the national unweighted average sitting at 0.90% across the 50 states in 2026, close to the 0.9%-1.0% range the Tax Foundation has reported since its 2022 table. What has changed more recently is the federal side of the equation: the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act quadrupled the SALT deduction cap, a shift covered later on this page that materially affects what high-tax-state homeowners actually owe the IRS.

National Average
0.90%
Highest Rate
1.88%
Lowest Rate
0.29%
High-Low Spread
6.5x

All 50 States + DC Ranked by Effective Property Tax Rate

RankStateEffective RateAnnual Tax on $300k Home (est.)Calculator
1New Jersey1.88%$5,640Calculate NJ tax
1Illinois1.88%$5,640Calculate IL tax
3Connecticut1.54%$4,620Calculate CT tax
4Vermont1.51%$4,530Calculate VT tax
5New Hampshire1.50%$4,500Calculate NH tax
6Nebraska1.44%$4,320Calculate NE tax
7Texas1.40%$4,200Calculate TX tax
8Ohio1.36%$4,080Calculate OH tax
9Iowa1.33%$3,990Calculate IA tax
10Wisconsin1.32%$3,960Calculate WI tax
11New York1.30%$3,900Calculate NY tax
12Pennsylvania1.26%$3,780Calculate PA tax
13Kansas1.21%$3,630Calculate KS tax
14Michigan1.19%$3,570Calculate MI tax
15Rhode Island1.12%$3,360Calculate RI tax
16Massachusetts1.00%$3,000Calculate MA tax
16Minnesota1.00%$3,000Calculate MN tax
16South Dakota1.00%$3,000Calculate SD tax
19Maine0.98%$2,940Calculate ME tax
20Alaska0.94%$2,820Calculate AK tax
21Maryland0.92%$2,760Calculate MD tax
21North Dakota0.92%$2,760Calculate ND tax
23Missouri0.89%$2,670Calculate MO tax
24Oregon0.81%$2,430Calculate OR tax
25Georgia0.79%$2,370Calculate GA tax
25Oklahoma0.79%$2,370Calculate OK tax
27Florida0.78%$2,340Calculate FL tax
27Virginia0.78%$2,340Calculate VA tax
29Indiana0.76%$2,280Calculate IN tax
30Washington0.75%$2,250Calculate WA tax
31Kentucky0.74%$2,220Calculate KY tax
32California0.70%$2,100Calculate CA tax
33North Carolina0.66%$1,980Calculate NC tax
34New Mexico0.63%$1,890Calculate NM tax
35Montana0.61%$1,830Calculate MT tax
36Mississippi0.58%$1,740Calculate MS tax
37Arkansas0.56%$1,680Calculate AR tax
37District of Columbia0.56%$1,680Calculate DC tax
39Louisiana0.55%$1,650Calculate LA tax
40Delaware0.54%$1,620Calculate DE tax
41Wyoming0.53%$1,590Calculate WY tax
42Tennessee0.52%$1,560Calculate TN tax
43West Virginia0.51%$1,530Calculate WV tax
44Colorado0.50%$1,500Calculate CO tax
44Idaho0.50%$1,500Calculate ID tax
44Nevada0.50%$1,500Calculate NV tax
47South Carolina0.49%$1,470Calculate SC tax
48Arizona0.48%$1,440Calculate AZ tax
48Utah0.48%$1,440Calculate UT tax
50Alabama0.37%$1,110Calculate AL tax
51Hawaii0.29%$870Calculate HI tax
Source: Tax Foundation, Property Taxes by State and County, 2026 (2024 ACS data). Dollar amounts are estimates applying the statewide effective rate to a $300,000 home and do not reflect county, exemption, or assessment-cap variation.

New Jersey and Illinois sit alone at the top of the ranking, tied at 1.88%, a full 34 basis points above third-place Connecticut. Hawaii anchors the bottom at 0.29%, less than a sixth of the top rate, with Alabama the only other state under 0.40%.

The gap exists because New Jersey and Illinois both fund an unusually large share of local government, especially K-12 schools, through the property tax rather than state income or sales tax transfers. Hawaii sits at the opposite extreme partly because the state levies property tax almost exclusively at the county level with narrow rate bands, and partly because high median home values push the effective rate down even when dollar collections are not small.

A state’s rank in this table is the right tool for relocation screening and first-pass budgeting. It is the wrong tool for underwriting a specific purchase: every state calculator linked above breaks the statewide figure down by county and layers in homestead exemptions, which is where the real number for a specific address comes from.

Why Property Tax Rates Vary So Much by State

StateAssessment BasisReassessment TriggerStructural Note
Texas100% of market valueEvery sale, plus annual reappraisalNo state income tax; property tax is the primary local revenue source
CaliforniaAcquisition value, capped at 2%/year growthSale or new construction (Prop 13)Long-held properties can be assessed far below current market value
South Carolina4% of market value for owner-occupied homesPeriodic countywide reassessmentLow assessment ratio offsets a comparatively high millage rate
FloridaJust value, capped for homesteaded property (Save Our Homes)Sale resets cap; annual cap otherwise 3% or CPINew buyers often see a first-year jump versus the prior owner’s capped bill
Illinois33.3% of market value statewide; Cook County uses separate class ratiosTriennial reassessment cycle, varies by countyNo state-level cap; local school levies drive the high statewide average
Source: Tax Foundation, Property Tax Relief and Reform, 2026; state department of revenue publications.

Statutory millage rates are not comparable across states because assessment ratios differ so widely. A 30-mill levy in a state that assesses at 100% of market value produces a far larger bill than the same 30 mills in a state assessing at 4%, which is exactly why the Tax Foundation and this page report effective rates, actual tax paid divided by market value, rather than raw millage.

States that lean hardest on the property tax tend to be states that either have no income tax (Texas, New Hampshire) or that fund an outsized share of K-12 education locally rather than through state transfers (New Jersey, Illinois, Connecticut). Property taxes made up 28.9% of total state and local tax collections nationally in fiscal year 2023 and 70.0% of local tax collections specifically, which is why states that push more fiscal responsibility to the local level show up near the top of this ranking almost by construction.

Expect the funding-model gap between high- and low-property-tax states to persist rather than close. States near the bottom, like Hawaii and Alabama, raise comparable or greater shares of revenue through income and sales taxes instead, so a low property tax rate rarely means an overall low tax burden; it means the burden is collected elsewhere.

Regional Patterns: Northeast, Midwest, South, and West

RegionHighest-Rate StateLowest-Rate StateRegional Pattern
NortheastNew Jersey (1.88%)Delaware (0.54%)Consistently the highest-rate region; heavy local school funding reliance
MidwestIllinois (1.88%)Missouri (0.89%)Wide internal spread; Illinois and Ohio high, Missouri and Indiana moderate
SouthTexas (1.40%)Alabama (0.37%)Widest regional spread; no-income-tax states cluster near the top
WestMontana (0.61%)Hawaii (0.29%)Lowest region overall; assessment caps common (CA, OR)
Source: Tax Foundation, Property Taxes by State and County, 2026. Regional groupings follow Census Bureau region definitions.

The Northeast is the only region where every state sits above the 0.50% mark, and five of the ten highest-rate states nationally are Northeastern. The region’s older housing stock and dense network of independent municipalities and school districts, each with its own levy, keeps effective rates structurally high regardless of which party controls a given statehouse.

The South shows the widest internal spread of any region, from Texas at 1.40% down to Alabama at 0.37%, a difference driven mainly by whether the state has an income tax. Texas, Tennessee, and Florida lean on property tax in the absence of one; Alabama and Louisiana keep property tax low in part because they tax other bases, including relatively high sales tax rates, more aggressively.

The West is the lowest-taxed region on this metric, largely because of assessment-limitation laws. California’s Prop 13 and Oregon’s Measure 50 both cap annual assessment growth well below market appreciation, which mechanically suppresses the effective rate even in expensive coastal markets. Expect that gap to persist as long as those caps remain in place, since the caps affect the denominator of the effective-rate calculation directly, not just the tax rate itself.

States With No Income Tax: Does That Mean Higher Property Tax?

StateState Income TaxProperty Tax Effective RateNational Rank
New HampshireNone on wages1.50%5
TexasNone1.40%7
AlaskaNone0.94%20
WashingtonNone on wages0.75%30
WyomingNone0.53%41
TennesseeNone0.52%42
NevadaNone0.50%44
FloridaNone0.78%27
South DakotaNone1.00%16
Source: Tax Foundation, Property Taxes by State and County, 2026; state revenue department income tax statutes.

Four of the nine states with no wage income tax, New Hampshire, Texas, Alaska, and South Dakota, rank in the top half nationally for property tax rate, while the other five sit in the bottom half. The relationship is real but not universal: New Hampshire and Texas both post property tax rates well above the 0.90% national average precisely because they have no income tax to lean on instead.

Nevada, Wyoming, and Florida break the pattern by keeping property tax moderate to low despite having no income tax, largely because tourism and severance taxes (Wyoming’s mineral extraction levy, Florida and Nevada’s tourist and sales tax bases) do the revenue work that property tax would otherwise have to do.

Anyone relocating for the “no income tax” headline should run the full picture, not just wages: New Hampshire’s 1.50% property tax rate on a $500,000 home is roughly $7,500 a year, which can offset a meaningful share of the income tax savings depending on the home’s value relative to income.

Federal SALT Deduction: The 2026 Cap Increase and Who Benefits

Tax YearSALT Deduction CapPhase-Down Begins (MAGI)
2017-2024 (TCJA)$10,000No phase-down; flat cap
2025$40,000$500,000
2026$40,400$500,500
2027-2029Rises 1% per yearRises 1% per year
2030 onwardReverts to $10,000No phase-down; flat cap
Source: IRS Topic No. 503, Deductible Taxes; Bipartisan Policy Center, SALT Deduction Changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act capped the federal deduction for combined state and local taxes, including property tax, at $10,000. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed in July 2025, raised that cap to $40,000 for the 2025 tax year and $40,400 for 2026, with 1% annual increases scheduled through 2029 before the cap reverts to $10,000 in 2030.

The higher cap phases down for high earners: taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income above $500,500 in 2026 see the deduction reduced by 30 cents per dollar of income over that threshold, though it never falls below $10,000. A household earning $600,000 or more in 2026 is effectively back at the old $10,000 limit regardless of how much SALT it actually paid.

This change matters most in exactly the states that top this page’s ranking. A New Jersey household paying $12,000 in property tax plus state income tax could deduct only $10,000 of that combined total under the old rule; under the 2026 rule, assuming income stays under the phase-down threshold, the full amount becomes deductible, which is a meaningfully different after-tax cost of ownership than the same household faced as recently as the 2024 tax year.

“Property tax reform is going to continue to be an issue going into 2026 because it was largely not resolved in 2025 or in years prior, and taxpayers are still clamoring for relief.”
Manish Bhatt, Senior Policy Analyst, Center for State Tax Policy, Tax Foundation

Expect continued state-level pressure on property tax even with federal relief in place. The SALT cap increase changes what homeowners can deduct on their federal return; it does not change what states and counties levy, and Bhatt’s point is that the underlying rate pressure households feel locally has not gone away just because Washington moved the deduction ceiling.

How Effective Rates Compare to What You Will Actually Pay

StateSpecial RulePractical Impact
CaliforniaProp 13 cap: assessed value grows at most 2% per year until saleLong-tenured owners can pay well below the statewide 0.70% average; buyers reset near market value
FloridaSave Our Homes cap: homesteaded assessment grows at most 3% or CPI per yearNew buyers’ first-year bill can exceed the prior owner’s bill by a wide margin
Texas10% annual cap on homestead appraisal increases; no cap on non-homestead propertyOwner-occupants are partially insulated from fast local appreciation; investors are not
New JerseyNo statewide assessment cap; municipal reassessment cycles varyStatewide 1.88% average has limited structural ceiling on year-over-year growth
IllinoisNo statewide cap; Cook County uses separate class-based assessment ratios from downstateChicago-area bills can diverge substantially from the rest of the state within the same average
Source: Tax Foundation, Property Tax Relief and Reform, 2026; state constitutional and statutory homestead provisions.

A statewide effective rate is a population-weighted average across every county, city, and school district in the state, not a prediction for any single parcel. A homeowner’s actual bill depends on the county’s specific millage, any city or special-district add-ons, and whichever assessment cap or homestead exemption applies to that property.

Assessment caps are the single biggest reason an individual bill can diverge from the state figure. California’s 0.70% statewide average blends recently purchased homes assessed near market value with decades-held homes still capped near their original purchase price under Prop 13, so the true range within the state runs far wider than the single average number suggests.

Anyone using this page to screen a relocation or a purchase should treat the state rank as a starting filter and the county-level calculator as the actual planning tool. Each state page linked in the table above breaks the statewide average down to the county level and factors in the state’s specific homestead exemption, which is where a genuinely usable estimate comes from.

Using State-Level Data: From Statewide Averages to Your County

What You Have HereWhat It Tells YouWhat It Does Not Tell You
Statewide effective rateRelative tax burden for relocation and budget screening across statesYour specific county, city, or school district rate
Regional averagesBroad policy patterns tied to funding models and assessment lawIndividual state or county variation within a region
No-income-tax comparisonWhether a state substitutes property tax for income tax revenueYour household’s specific total tax burden at your income level
SALT cap tableWhat portion of your total state and local tax bill is federally deductibleWhether itemizing beats the standard deduction for your household
Source: USPropertyStats editorial analysis, compiled from the sources cited throughout this page.

Every state name in the ranking table links to that state’s dedicated calculator, which adds a county selector, the state’s specific homestead exemption rules, and a top-counties breakdown that this page does not attempt to replicate at national scale. That is a deliberate division of labor: this page answers “which states are expensive,” the state pages answer “what will I actually pay.”

Two structural questions are worth checking before treating any number on this page as a bill: whether the state or county reassesses at sale (Texas and most of the Northeast do; California and Florida cap the reset), and whether a homestead exemption applies to the property in question, since exemptions can shave 10% to 30% off the taxable value in states that offer them.

For buyers weighing states against each other on affordability broader than property tax alone, this data connects most directly to Home Affordability in America: Income, Prices, and the Gap and Housing Market by State: Prices, Growth, and Key Statistics, which put the property tax figures on this page alongside median price and income data for full-picture comparisons.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *